Quantcast
Subscribe!

 

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

 

E-mail Steve
This form does not yet contain any fields.

    free counters

    Twitter Feed
    « PODCAST - #HRHappyHour 289 - User Experience in HR Tech, Live from Inforum 2017 | Main | PODCAST - #HRHappyHour 288 - Workplace Movie Hall of Fame: Mr. Mom »
    Tuesday
    Jul112017

    Learn a new word: The General Theory of Second Best

    There's nothing I care more about that NBA basketball, (I promise this isn't another basketball post, but I may have to dig out a basketball analogy to make the point), with the possible exception of learning new things.

    Which is why, I think, I run the 'Learn a new word' series on the blog. I am also falling into the trap of thinking 'if this is interesting to me, then it should be interesting to people who read this blog'. After 10 years of this, I am not really sure if that is even true. But I persist.

    So here's today's 'Learn a new word' entry - The General Theory of Second Best.

    What in the heck is that?

    A decent description can be found in the Economist: (emphasis mine)

    The theory of the second-best was first laid out in a 1956 paper titled, sensibly enough, "The General Theory of the Second Best", [paid access] by Richard Lipsey and Kelvin Lancaster. Roughly put, Lipsey and Lancaster pointed out that when it comes to the theoretical conditions for an optimal allocation of resources, the absence of any of the jointly necessary conditions does not imply that the next-best allocation is secured by the presence of all the other conditions. Rather, the second-best scenario may require that other of the necessary conditions for optimality also be absent—maybe even all of them. The second-best may look starkly different than the first best.

    Let's think on that for a moment and take it back (sorry) to the basketball analogy I hinted at in the open.

    The optimal allocation of resources for say a basketball team has traditionally consisted of five different kinds of players, with different body types, playing styles, and characteristics that when assembled, would provide the team with the right balance of scoring, passing, rebounding, and defensive play that would result in winning.

    But let's say that the team can't acquire or develop one of the positions, let's say the point guard - the player who usually is charged with handling the ball, setting up his/her teammates for easy scores, and functioning as the on-court leader of the team. If this example team can't find a good enough point guard, the Theory of Second Best suggests that 'answer' to the problem isn't making sure the other four positions/roles are filled as designed and slotting in any old player as the point guard.

    The theory suggests that the 'optimal' solution, when one resource (the point guard), is missing, may be to take a completely different approach to building the team. Maybe the team looks for more 'point guard' like skills in the other positions, or maybe the team implements a different style of offense entirely to mitigate the problem.

    The real point is that once conditions appear that make the 'first best' strategy impossible to execute, that you may need to think really, really differently about what will constitute the 'second best' strategy. 

    The second best may look starkly different than the first best.

    I really dig that and hope you think about it too, once your plans in business or in life run into some challenges.

    PrintView Printer Friendly Version

    EmailEmail Article to Friend

    References (3)

    References allow you to track sources for this article, as well as articles that were written in response to this article.

    Reader Comments (5)

    The General Theory of Second Best sounds interesting however is it possible to use a different scenario aside from sports? How about in business such as HR, Purchasing or Marketing. The idea cannot be fully grasp since the illustrated example (which is simple and basic) deviates from the original point of view which is relative to economics. It is best to make the readers relate to the essence of the theory with an example analogy they can all relate to especially in the field of discipline.

    Yahoo provides various integral features to your account and increase protection but somehow you found some technical flaws in accessing your yahoo email account.If you are facing any issues regarding yahoo email account, we are ready to help you 24*7 with out technical experts team.We are third party yahoo uk technical support ready to assist you anytime just dial our toll free yahoo phone number at +44-808-1644-506.Visit: http://www.customercarenumber.us/

    July 14, 2017 | Unregistered CommenterRoger Ferdrer

    Contact Toll free Yahoo Customer Support Number UK+44(0)800 014 8093 for email related problems yahoo login errors, email attachment issues, forgot password problem, mail configuration issues, security questions related issues, email setting problems, account hacking problems and so on, we have the best & talented technical engineers team who resolve your email problems in a minute. For More information visit the website http://www.email-customercare.co.uk/

    September 1, 2017 | Unregistered CommenterJennifer Albes

    If you are using a HP, then it is suggested that you go for taking the help of the HP customer care center. They can provide you with comprehensive solutions and make sure that the problem you are facing with your printer is solved from the root.

    October 27, 2017 | Unregistered CommenterHp Help

    We organize and offer inbound trips to Bhutan that can be customized to suit the taste of the visitor. It’s our service that you will again satisfaction exploring the concerns of the last at:

    September 3, 2019 | Unregistered Commenteraster travel agency

    PostPost a New Comment

    Enter your information below to add a new comment.

    My response is on my own website »
    Author Email (optional):
    Author URL (optional):
    Post:
     
    Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>