Quantcast
Subscribe!

 

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

 

E-mail Steve
This form does not yet contain any fields.

    free counters

    Twitter Feed
    « Job Titles of the Future #4 - Cat Video Technologist | Main | Off Topic: The Home Office of 2001 »
    Monday
    Jun102013

    If you want more leaders, you have to let them lead

    The NBA Finals are underway, and as I write this post the San Antonio Spurs are still enjoying a 1-0 series lead, primarily due to the steady play of their veteran stalwarts, Tim Duncan and Tony Parker. Parker, their point guard hit a remarkable shot near the end of the game to put the Spurs in a commanding position, and Duncan shook off a bad start to put up 20 points and 14 rebounds and contributed all-around solid play.

    These two players, (along with Manu Ginobili), with a combined 10 championships between them, have formed the core, of one of the most auspicious franchises in all of professional sports. Throughout the Spurs run of success there has been one more constant - the Spurs long time coach Gregg Popovich. Popovich has been at the helm of the Spurs since the late 1990s, (an amazingly long tenure in the coaching world), and has helped build and lead the Spurs to four titles, (going for number five as we speak). 'Pop' has been successful for a myriad of reasons, (getting the #1 pick in the Draft in 1997 and landing Duncan perhaps the most important and fortunate one), but I'd like to call out just one in this post, one that I think speaks to the trust he places in his leaders, and how he challenges them to continue to develop.

    In Game 1, Parker hit his amazing shot to put the Spurs up by 4 points with just a few seconds left to play. Miami called timeout, and after the timeout would have a just about impossible task, make up 4 points on one possession. But still, stranger things have happened, and a Spurs mistake, say fouling a Miami shooter attempting a 3-point shot made the unlikely scenario at lease possible. In situations like this, coaches always take a minute during the timeout to implore the players on the team leading by 4 to make sure they play smart, do not foul under any circumstances, and generally stay focused and sharp despite the seemingly high probability that victory was safe.

    As I say coaches usually give these kinds of instructions, especially NBA coaches, and especially in the waning moments of what was an incredibly tense and close game, and in the Finals no less, the pinnacle of competition for these teams.  

    What did the Spurs and Coach Popovich do and say during that last, tension-filled timeout? 

    Catch the video below and see, (Email and RSS subscribers will need to click through).

    Did you see that? Tony Parker, the on-court leader of the team, talked with Coach Popovich, made sure they were in alignment on the preferred message/strategy, and then proceeded to walk back the huddle with the other players and run the timeout conversation just like the 'real' coach normally does. 

    Did you see all the players immediately lean in to listen to Parker? Did you notice that Parker sat in the chair facing the other players?, (where in 99% of these timeout huddles you will see the coach usually sits).

    Did you see any of the players looking around, confused, wondering 'Where is the coach?'

    And finally, did you see Popovich sticking his head back in to the huddle at all, to make sure everything was taken care of?

    Of course the answer is No to all those questions.

    Popovich has done a lot of great things in a legendary coaching career, and from this 45 seconds or so we can see that developing leaders is one of them.

    If you want more leaders in any organization, you have to let them lead, like Pop did to Parker in this moment - a big, important moment no less.

    You have to let them lead. It's the only way to know if they will do it. And if they can do it.

    And this is hard to write coming from a guy who is puling for LeBron.

    Have a great week!

    PrintView Printer Friendly Version

    EmailEmail Article to Friend

    References (1)

    References allow you to track sources for this article, as well as articles that were written in response to this article.

    Reader Comments (4)

    Oddly enough, there was a time when Parker wasn't trusted in the least. He had to be developed, and perhaps more importantly, be open to being developed to get to this point.

    That sort of humility is ingrained in to the Spurs franchise (I think it started with Mr. Robinson), Win or lose in this series, the last 16 years or so goes to show what can be accomplished when there is a leader in every seat.

    June 10, 2013 | Unregistered CommenterCarlos Escobar

    Thanks Carlos -that is a great point about the importance of development as well. And the Spurs are a great example of that philosophy. Thanks for reading!

    June 11, 2013 | Registered CommenterSteve

    Hi Steve,

    Really like this example of letting the leaders you've coached into being leaders actually lead. I also like that it was Parker who did the talking when he went up to Pop - demonstrating he knew (or at least was proposing) what to share with the rest of the team. Really great example - thanks for sharing.

    June 11, 2013 | Unregistered CommenterMelany Gallant

    How often did you notice how the people in power assign as Project Managers or Team Leaders people who had not a single leadership quality in them? How much do you dread those moments? I know I do.
    I am just wondering if your HR department is in anyway involved in the process of appointing people into leadership positions, or if there is any kind of training that you prepare for people finding themselves into this kind of positions.

    June 13, 2013 | Unregistered CommenterSean Schlibowitz

    PostPost a New Comment

    Enter your information below to add a new comment.

    My response is on my own website »
    Author Email (optional):
    Author URL (optional):
    Post:
     
    Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>